Commercial full-stack SaaS boilerplate
Gravity Alternative: build SaaS with source-owned modules.
Compare Gravity with StackFoundry when you want SaaS building blocks without adopting a large prebuilt product skeleton.
Teams that want a large prebuilt product skeleton with screens, integrations, and conventional SaaS workflows.
What Gravity is known for
Full-stack SaaS boilerplate positioning
Auth, billing, team workflows, and integration surfaces
A paid license or renewal model
A broad product skeleton approach
Where StackFoundry differs
Smaller modules instead of one large skeleton
Install paths that can target an existing app
Free and MIT-licensed registry source
Explicit App Router, env, migration, and responsive verification guidance
When to choose StackFoundry instead
You want production SaaS systems, but your team should decide the final app shell and product flow.
Gravity SaaS alternativeSaaS boilerplate alternativesource modules
Source Registry
Dry-run a complete SaaS recipe before adopting any app shape.
Start with API SaaS, inspect the exact source files, then decide whether the modules belong in your app.
pnpm stackfoundry add recipe api-saas-starter --target ./my-app --dry-run